Maxwell v. County of Freeborn
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Freeborn County Board of Commissioners appeals from a May 7, 1985 judgment dismissing its petition for improvement of an existing drainage system under Minn. Stat. § 106.501 (1984). We affirm.
FACTS
Judicial Ditch No. 9 was originally established in 1923 and lies entirely in Freeborn County. The system is composed of a main tile line which empties into an open ditch; the open ditch then empties into a larger tile line which proceeds arpproximately two miles to the point of outlet into Pickerel Lake. Branches enter the main tile line and open ditch segments at various points…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seidlitz v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re Improvement of County Ditch No. 11, Martin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Pell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Oelke v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pestka v. County of Blue EarthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002