Biodynamic Technologies, Inc. v. Chattanooga Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ENTERING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFFS
SPELLMAN, District Judge.
I
BACKGROUND
This CAUSE comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s, Biodynamic Technologies, Inc., [hereinafter Biodynamic] Motion for the Entry of an Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment on the issue of Liability on Counts III, VII and X of the Amended Complaint.
A brief summary of the facts is as follows. Biodynamic is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Bro-ward County, Florida. The Defendant, Chattanooga Corporation, [hereinafter Chattanooga] is a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flotec, Inc. v. Southern Research, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
- Biodynamic Technologies, Inc. v. Chattanooga Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
- Concept, Inc. v. Thermotemp, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Cook Group Inc. v. Wilson (In Re Wilson)District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
- PainTEQ, LLC v. Omnia Medical, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024