Legal Opinion

Biodynamic Technologies, Inc. v. Chattanooga Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 19, 1986No. 85-6069-CivPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ENTERING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFFS

SPELLMAN, District Judge.

I

BACKGROUND

This CAUSE comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s, Biodynamic Technologies, Inc., [hereinafter Biodynamic] Motion for the Entry of an Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment on the issue of Liability on Counts III, VII and X of the Amended Complaint.

A brief summary of the facts is as follows. Biodynamic is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Bro-ward County, Florida. The Defendant, Chattanooga Corporation, [hereinafter Chattanooga] is a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  5. Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flotec, Inc. v. Southern Research, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
  2. Biodynamic Technologies, Inc. v. Chattanooga Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
  3. Concept, Inc. v. Thermotemp, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Cook Group Inc. v. Wilson (In Re Wilson)District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
  5. PainTEQ, LLC v. Omnia Medical, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API