Ginsburg Development Corp. v. Town Board
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*25OPINION OF THE COURT
John R. LaCava, J.
The primary issue of interest raised in this CPLR article 78 proceeding is whether respondent Town Board of the Town of Cortlandt was required to take into account potential socioeconomic effects when rendering its environmental review, pursuant to ECL article 8 (the State Environmental Quality Review Act — SEQRA), of an amendment to section 88-39.2 of chapter 88 (Zoning) of the Town Code of the Town of Cortlandt (commonly referred to as the amendment to the "steep slopes ordinance”). More particularly, whether it was required to take a "hard look” at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Chinese Staff & Workers Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Har Enterprises v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Niagara Recycling, Inc. v. Town Board of NiagaraNew York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holiday Point Marina Partners v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995