Griego v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*571Opinion
PERREN, J.
The state initiates civil proceedings to declare a person a sexually violent predator (SVP). In exchange for his deposition testimony on certain matters, he receives transactional immunity for those matters and “any of the matters that he may testify to.” Here we conclude that he may not be prosecuted for a crime relating to his deposition testimony.
Facts
The People initiated proceedings to declare petitioner Leonard Griego an SVP. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) While the petition was pending, the People noticed his deposition.
Griego, claiming the shield of the Fifth…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hein v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Leake v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. C.S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2010