Legal Opinion

Newfoundland American Insurance v. Kamieniecki

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 21, 1963No. 5092PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

It is probably an understatement to say that the courts have not been harmonious in applying the care, custody and’ control exclusion clause in liability insurance policies. 2 Richards, Insurance (5th ed.) s. 301A (1962 supp); Annot. 62 A.L.R. 2d 1242. “The courts have been more reluctant to apply the care, custody and control exclusion to realty than to chattels. Where, for instance, the insured has contracted to and is actually in the process of erecting a structure at the time of damage to *427that structure, then the exclusion is applicable. If, however, the contract is to make alterations or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas W. Hooley & Sons v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  2. Meiser v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. A. T. Morris & Co. v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  4. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Mason-Moore-Tracy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Cohen v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goswick v. Employers Casualty CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Transformer Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  3. Richardson v. Virgin Islands Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1981
  4. Mead v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  5. Northwestern National Insurance v. Pennington Bros.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API