Legal Opinion

Yocono's Restaurant, Inc. v. Yocono

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1994No. 16656PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Judge.

Defendant Nunzie Yocono has appealed from a judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas that permanently enjoined him from using his surname, “Yocono,” in connection with a restaurant in a certain geographic area. The trial court concluded that plaintiff Yocono’s Restaurant, Inc. had established, by clear and convincing evidence, that its use of the name “Yocono” in connection with an Italian restaurant it operates had caused that name to acquire a secondary meaning. It further concluded that defendant’s use of the same name in connection with his Italian restaurant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Miller Brewing Company v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. Planned Parenthood Asss'n v. Project JerichoOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Worthington Foods, Inc. v. Kellogg Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  5. Royer v. Bd. of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Daddy's Junky Music Stores, Inc. v. Big Daddy's Family Music CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  4. In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. Dawson v. Blockbuster, Inc., Unpublished Decision (3-16-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API