Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Whatcom County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1895No. 1882PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, .Whatcom County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

Respondent brought this action against appellant, the county of Whatcom, to recover the sum *392of $300 alleged to have.been paid out by him for clerk hire and salary of deputy in his office as county-auditor for the month of April, 1895. He alleges in his complaint that he was compelled to retain in his office three clerks, Dillon, Bateman and Ouster, and the deputy, Brand, in order to dispatch the duties of his said office during said month; that the county commissioners of defendant county had attempted to discharge all the clerks in his…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Board of Commissioners v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People ex rel. Oebricks v. Superior CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  5. Allen v. LoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Yeargin v. MaschkeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State Ex Rel. Becker v. WileyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. Farmer v. AustinWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. StockwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Thomas v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API