Marlow v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Chief Judge:
On February 20, 1992, Albert A. Mokal filed a motion for review of this Court’s February 5, 1992, memorandum decision, which affirmed a Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision denying entitlement to an earlier effective date for special monthly compensation. Because Mr. Mokal's motion raised the issue of “clear and unmistakable error,” an issue then being addressed by the Court in Russell v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 310 (1992), the Court held the motion for review in abeyance. Subsequently, Mr. Mokal died and, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs maintaining that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Russell v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Bethea v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Butts v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Brewer v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Glynn v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Marlow v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Wamhoff v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.