Legal Opinion
David Marts, Doing Business as Lasertech v. Xerox, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1996No. 95-2887PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANA E. MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
David Marts, doing business as Lasertech, brought this action alleging that Xerox, Inc. violated federal antitrust and Arkansas law by conditioning certain photocopier warranties on the use of Xerox replacement copy cartridges. After both sides moved for summary judgment, the district court 1 granted the motion of Xerox and ordered judgment entered in its favor. Marts appeals from that judgment, and we affirm for the following reasons.
Xerox manufactures several models of photocopiers in the twelve to thirty page per minute category, referred to as convenience…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm Corporation, Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Brokerage Concepts v. US Healthcare Inc (Part II)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Virginia Panel Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Mac Panel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Tralon Corp. v. Cedarapids, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Lockhart v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.