Legal Opinion

Berland v. Berland

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1989No. A043835PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that the trial court, in granting a motion to modify a Richmond spousal support order, possesses broad discretion not only as to how long to extend the order, but also as to the amount of spousal support ordered to be paid during the extension. A Richmond order is normally issued with the expectation that if the supported spouse exercises reasonable diligence, he or she will have become self-supporting by the date set for support payments to end. If the court finds that there was a failure to exercise reasonable diligence to become self-supporting, but that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Marriage of BergmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. In Re Marriage of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. In Re Marriage of Prietsch & CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re the Marriage of BerlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API