Quicken Loans Inc. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 15)
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge :
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Dkt. 15). For the reasons explained fully below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion to dismiss, because Plaintiff Quicken Loans Inc. has failed to state a claim either under the Administrative Procedures Act or the Constitution. With no remaining independent basis to exercise jurisdiction, the Court,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Quicken Loans Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Endo Pharm. Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- United States v. Quicken Loans Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- City of Highland Park v. MengeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Johnson v. FCA USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.