Legal Opinion

AssuredPartners of California Insurance Services LLC v. Mary Pahl, et al.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 18, 2026No. 4:25-cv-00693Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 AssuredPartners of California Insurance No. CV-25-00693-TUC-RM Services LLC, 10 ORDER Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 Mary Pahl, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 61) 16 and Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Doc. 87). The Motion for Preliminary Injunction is 17 fully briefed. (Docs. 66, 78.) Plaintiff filed a Response to the Motion to Strike. (Doc. 88.) 18 For the following reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the Motion for 19…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Samuel Lopez v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Mark Munns v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API