Legal Opinion
Healey v. Barker Foundation
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 14, 1983No. Nos. 82-1664, 83-399PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
Susan R. Healey appeals from a judgment* of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia dismissing her derivative action seeking a declaratory judgment and mandatory injunction against The Barker Foundation. The trial court granted appellee’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Super.Ct.Civ.R. 12(b)(6). We affirm.
Given this posture of the case, we must construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the appellant and accept as true all its material allegations. McBryde v. Amoco Oil Co., 404 A.2d 200, 202 (D.C.1979);…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- William L. O'Brien v. Robert J. DigraziaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Geraldine C. Medina v. Warren B. RudmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- McBryde v. Amoco Oil Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Clayton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Foretich v. CBS, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Geary v. Nat'l Newspaper Publishers Assoc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992