Legal Opinion

Sherover v. John Wanamaker

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 17, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, holder of two patents, sues for an alleged infringement thereof by defendant “selling mattresses embodying the patented inventions”. Defendant prior to answering the complaint makes two motions — one under Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for a- more definite statement of the article or articles alleged to infringe the patent in suit. At the argument it was agreed that plaintiff would satisfy the demand of this motion by stating that “the mattress sold by the defendant under the name of ‘Royal Foam’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McConville v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1938

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ramos Mimoso v. PuebloSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  2. Eberle v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Kuhn v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. McAuleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  5. Massaro v. Fisk Rubber CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API