Dooley v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, D. Minnesota
At Law. Action by Avis Dooley against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, in which the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company and others were summoned as garnishees. On motion to quasli the garnishment proceedings and discharge the garnishees.
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, District Judge.
The main facts upon which the present motion is based are not in dispute. The garnishment summons was served on the several garnishees on January 29, 1918. Notice was thereafter given to the defendant company as required by statute. Disclosures were had, showing that several of the garnishees had, on the date of the service of the garnishee summons, certain traffic balances in their hands belonging to the defendant Pennsylvania Company. It is admitted that the defendant company and the several garnishee companies had all been taken under federal control prior to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. United States ex rel. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- County of Wilson v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Vaughn v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
- Lawrenceburg Roller Mills Co. v. Chas. A. Jones & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Pioneer Real Estate Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- McGregor v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.