Legal Opinion
Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. v. Titzer
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 2001No. B149382PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CURRY, J.
This is an appeal from an order of dismissal following the grant of respondent Joe Titzer’s motion to quash service of process on a complaint filed by appellant Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The essential facts are not in dispute. Appellant is a consumer electronic products manufacturer incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands and based in Hong Kong. Appellant’s stock is publicly traded in the United States on the NASDAQ National Market System. Respondent is an individual residing in Colorado.
Respondent, using seven…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pavlovich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Renoir v. Redstar Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- America Online, Inc. v. Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- K.A. v. Doe 1District Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Pavlovich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.