Legal Opinion
Nowlin v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 2001No. 99-CM-92PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Senior Judge:
Appellant Charles Nowlin appeals from his conviction after a non-jury trial for second-degree theft in contravention of D.C.Code §§ 22-3811, -3812(b) (1996 & Supp.2000). Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the evidence regarding his knowledge and intent was insufficient. Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that appellant’s conviction must be reversed.
I
The evidence adduced at trial shows that on January 15, 1997, appellant Nowlin walked into Crestar Bank, presented his driver’s license and Department of Human Services identification card and cashed a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Zanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mihas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Joiner-Die v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hammond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Peery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Russell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Cannon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.