Mahoney v. Wilson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
The Land Court, after its decision filed in March, 1925, had been affirmed by this court, Wood v. Wilson, 256 Mass. 340, granted a rehearing to the respondent. The cause is now before us upon exceptions taken at the rehearing. It is important to decide what was opened to the respondent by the allowance of the motion. The former decision established that the respondent was not the owner of the fee in the land in question, but was entitled to a right of way over the locus, and it fixed the location of the right of way. A motion for a rehearing of the entire matter, based on newly discovered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKenney v. McKenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Old Colony Street Railway Co. v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Kesseler v. BowditchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Burnham v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Wood v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cowden v. CuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Mugar v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Offshore Systems-Kenai v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Town of Bedford v. CerasuoloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Bates v. Town of CohassetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.