Legal Opinion

Mugar v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 29, 1990No. 88-P-587PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, C.J.

The plaintiffs are the owners, as trustees, of the land and buildings known as the Porter Square Shopping Center in Cambridge. In connection with the extension of its red line from Harvard Square to Alewife station, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) made eleven fee and easement takings by eminent domain, see *444G. L. c. 161 A, § 3(o), of parcels in and under the center’s parking lot. One of the fee takings was a 3,224 square foot area located near the center of the parking lot and designated for construction of a subway vent shaft. At issue in this appeal is the scope of a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Pheasant Ridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Wintersmith & Young v. Pointer & ConwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Labounty v. VickersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Dingley v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Drury v. Midland RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cheever v. GravesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Patterson v. PaulMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Adams v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Hamouda v. HarrisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  5. Cater v. BednarekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API