State v. Foust
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, J.:
The defendant appeals his jury conviction on a charge of rape. We reverse that conviction and remand for a new trial.
The facts are not particularly relevant to the issues on appeal. However, the record shows that the defendant and a friend were out driving in the defendant’s Jeep. They ultimately met with V.C., who, although she knew neither of the two men, agreed to go “four-wheeling” with them.
From this point on, the evidence is sharply conflicting. According to V.C., the defendant drove to a rural area where he dragged her out of the Jeep and forcibly raped her. V.C. testified…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stewart v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Ezell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.