Legal Opinion

Conlon v. Dean

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1968No. Docket 2,437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The plaintiff appeals a jury verdict of no cause of action assigning as error the trial judge’s refusal to allow impeachment of the defendant driver, Mrs. Pauline M. Dean, by means of a statement she gave an assistant prosecuting attorney the day her automobile struck the plaintiff Bernadette J. Conlon. The trial judge ruled the statement was privileged, adding: “The prosecutor was in fact counsel for Mrs. Dean.” We reverse. The statement was not privileged. The error was not harmless. The contents of the statement might have been regarded by the jury, had the jury been permitted to learn the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Vogel v. GruazSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. People v. AstaMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Simonetti v. Rinshed-Mason Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Siskonen v. Stanadyne, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
  4. Kent Concrete, Inc. v. Hospital Building & Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Orlich v. BuxtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API