Legal Opinion

Claim of Decker v. Kings Park Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 7, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lahtinen, J.(1) Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 4, 1998, which ruled that claimant had removed himself from exposure to harmful noise in compliance with Workers’ Compensation Law § 49-bb, and (2) cross appeals from an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 4, 1999, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related disability and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant, an operating engineer, filed a claim in November 1993 seeking workers’ compensation benefits for an occupational “27.9 percent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Claim of Kurzyna v. Communicar, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Claim of MacKenzie v. Management RecruitersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Grucza v. Waste Stream TechnologyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Marks v. County of TompkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Claim of De Salvo v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Hughes v. Indian Valley Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Claim of Havern v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API