Legal Opinion

In re Goldowitz

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 15, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

This is an application, made under somewhat unusual circumstances, to compel executors to file and proceed to settle their account.

The petitioner is the attorney employed in the estate of testatrix’s husband, who predeceased her, and from whom substantially all of the assets of this estate are derived. His services in this regard were extended, arduous and successful.

In or about June, 1933, he made an application in the husband’s estate under section, 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act for a fixation of his fees, as a result of which a stipulation was entered into “ that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WeissmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  2. In re the Estate of SurplessNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of IrvingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  2. In re the Estate of GourlayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. In re the Accounting of Ogdensburg Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API