Adam v. Wright
Supreme Court of Georgia
Mandamus. Constitutional law. Statutes. Costs. Expenses of court. Officers of court. Before Judge Ealligant. Richmond county, At chambers, January 20, 1890. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
Wright, solicitor-general, presented his petition for mandamus against the plaintiff in error as treasurer of Richmond county, in which he alleged that there was a certain sum due him as solicitor-general, for insolvent costs which remained unpaid by reason of a deficiency of funds arising from fines and forfeitures; that his bill for such costs had been allowed by the judge of the superior court, and its payment recommended by the grand jury. A mandamus absolute was issued by the judge of the superior court, requiring the plaintiff'in error as treasurer to pay the amount…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Adair v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bibb County v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Fullington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Morris v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Clark v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.