Legal Opinion

American Aerovap, Inc. v. Cauthorn

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 18, 1952No. Civ. No. 4452PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff alleges the ownership of letters patent No. 2,541,637, issued February 13, 1951, for, “Method of Vaporizing Lindane in Ventilated Rooms.”

Generally, the complainant alleges that defendant Cauthorn is the infringer, and that the others are contributory infringers.

The defendants deny generally, and, particularly, infringement and contributory infringement. They plead various pamphlets and publications alleged to be anticipations, *11and that complainant’s patent lacks invention, and is invalid.

Patent relates to the evaporation, or, vaporization, and/or sublimation of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LAITRAM CORPORATION v. Deepsouth Packing Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API