Legal Opinion

Thiringer v. Barlow

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1953No. 4601_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

William Barlow and Stella Barlow, husband and wife, instituted this action against Elmer Thiringer, doing business as Wray Oil Company, to recover damages arising out of a traffic accident which occurred in Wyoming. Primary negligence on the part of the defendant was denied; contributory negligence on the part of plaintiffs was pleaded; and by cross complaint, damages for injury to defendant’s motor vehicle were sought. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs on their cause of action and on the cross complaint; judgment was entered accordingly; and defendant appealed.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brigham Young University v. LillywhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. United States v. Regents of New Mexico School of MinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BanionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  5. Dyess v. W. W. Clyde & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Franklin v. SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  2. Tyler v. Dowell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation v. Jessie W. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. Harold Hobart v. Michael P. O'brien, Harold M. Hobart v. John G. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  5. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., an English Corporation v. F. Carroll FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API