Legal Opinion

Ramsay v. Ramsay

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 4, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Claims in Probate. — Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clinton County; the Hon.. Samuel L. Dwight, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bigelow

The naked question presented by this record is, whether a claimant, who has received a dividend from an ancillary administration, shall be postponed in the division of assets found in the domiciliary administration, to the extent of the per cent already received by him, the estate being insolvent. It is the contention of plaintiffs in error that by their assumed diligence in having had their claims allowed in the Probate Court of St. Louis, they have gained a preference over other creditors of the estate located in the domicile of the intestate, to the extent of the foreign assets paid over…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Furness v. Union National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cooper v. BeersIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Levy v. Chicago National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Rosenthal v. RenickIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. McGarvey v. DarnallIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crosby v. CharlestownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  2. Schmid & Smith v. ShawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API