Hanover, Fire Insurance v. Pruitt
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuehry, J.
This is a suit on a fire-insurance policy, because of
the destruction by fire of a certain stock of goods covered by the policy sued on. The petition alleged that the policy was in force, attached a copy of it to the petition, alleged the destruction of the stock of goods covered by the policy because of fire, the submission of proofs of loss, and the failure to pay. The defendant admitted that it issued the policy sued on, and pleaded that the policy contained this provision: “If a building or any part thereof fall, except as a result of fire, all insurance by this policy shall immediately…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Huckabee v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Western Assur. Co. of Toronto v. J. H. Mohlman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Morris v. Imperial Insurance Co. Ltd. of LondonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Rome Railroad v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- The Hanover Fire Insurance Company of New York v. George D. Argo, D/B/A Ruth's ShopCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Pruitt v. Hardware Dealers Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. SheftallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Polk v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Atlantic Mutual Fire Insurance v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.