Legal Opinion

State v. Turner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2002No. S-01-707PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Jim R. Turner, was convicted in county court for driving under the influence of alcohol, refusing to submit to a chemical test, and refusing to submit to a preliminary breath test for alcohol. The district court affirmed. On appeal, he argues that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,197(10) (Reissue 1998) is unconstitutional because the advisement by the arresting officer was inadequate and violated his right to due process. Under § 60-6,197(10), the arresting officer was required to advise Turner that a refusal to submit to a chemical test is a separate crime for which he could be charged.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Smith v. State, Dept. of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BainbridgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HynekNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Davis v. WimesNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. GalesNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Travis v. LahmNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. RushNebraska Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API