State v. Turner
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
The appellant, Jim R. Turner, was convicted in county court for driving under the influence of alcohol, refusing to submit to a chemical test, and refusing to submit to a preliminary breath test for alcohol. The district court affirmed. On appeal, he argues that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,197(10) (Reissue 1998) is unconstitutional because the advisement by the arresting officer was inadequate and violated his right to due process. Under § 60-6,197(10), the arresting officer was required to advise Turner that a refusal to submit to a chemical test is a separate crime for which he could be charged.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. State, Dept. of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BainbridgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HynekNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Davis v. WimesNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. GalesNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Travis v. LahmNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. RushNebraska Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016