Legal Opinion

Bradish v. Grant

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1886PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hollín S. Williamson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon

This was an action of ejectment, brought by George B. Grant, against William Bradish, to recover the possession of the west forty feet of lots 7 and 8, in block 60, in Bussell, Mather & Boberts’ addition to Chicago. The plea, alone, of not guilty was filed, whereby, under section 22, chapter 45, of the Bevised Statutes of 1874, the plaintiff had but to prove title in himself to maintain his action. This he did, by the introduction, in evidence, of the decree and bill of complaint in a chancery suit, brought to the May term, 1875, of the circuit court of Cook county, under the “Burnt Becords”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re FolgerNew York Court of Chancery · 1819

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. W. P. Iverson & Co. v. Dunham Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  2. Board of Education of Cicero-Stickney Township High School, High School District No. 201 v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Wright v. RisserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Harms v. CoryellIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Bonney v. LambIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API