Commonwealth v. Bateman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, P. J.,
This defendant was tried upon an indictment which in proper form charged fornication and bastardy, issue was joined upon his plea of not guilty and the trial resulted in a verdict of guilty as indicted. The defendant, by his counsel, filed a motion in arrest of judgment, assigning in support of said motion the following reasons: “First. No judgment against the said Earl Bateman, as to the charge of bastardy, can be lawfully rendered upon the record as it now stands. Second. The evidence against the defendant at the trial as to the charge of bastardy was not sufficient…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Delaware Division Canal Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Commonwealth v. BradleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Swan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Commonwealth v. GurleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KirkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. MoonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Commonwealth v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.