Legal Opinion

Coast v. Dubbs

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 22, 1937No. 3684PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaeRett, Judge

There is here brought to us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to Dubbs upon the three counts of an interference declared, at his solicitation, between his application and a patent to Coast.

The counts are for a process of treating hydrocarbon oil of a heavy character for the production of gasoline therefrom. Count 2 is typical and the same is quoted, the particular feature at issue being italicized:

2. The herein described method Qf treating hydrocarbon oil which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Briggs v. KaislingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Ellis v. ShawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Snitzer v. EtzelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. Otto Henning v. Scott F. HuntCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API