Legal Opinion

Shay v. Cesler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1999No. 23978PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KID WELL, Justice.

This appeal presents the issue of whether a prevailing employer can be awarded attorney fees when an employee makes a legitimate claim for wages under Title 45, Chapter 6 of the Idaho Code. The district court concluded that Richard and Joyce Cesler were entitled to recover attorney fees under I.C. § 12-120(3) for defending a wage claim made by Margot Shay. We reverse.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Margot Shay was employed by Richard and Joyce Cesler as installation manager at The Power House Car Audio from December 1994 to May 1995. The record shows that Shay was to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mickelsen v. City of RexburgIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lawless v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Independent Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Roe Ex Rel. Roe v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Kelly v. Silverwood EstatesIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Polk v. LarrabeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hayden Lake Fire Protection District v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Willie v. Board of TrusteesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. L & W SUPPLY CORP. v. Chartrand Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Farber v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API