Jewelcor Inc. v. Karfunkel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
POLLAK, District Judge.
Appellants Michael and George Kar-funkel, individually and as partners trading as M & G Equities (collectively referred to herein as “M & G”), appeal orders of the District Court denying M & G’s motion to dismiss a breach-of-lease claim brought by appellees, Jewel-cor Incorporated et. al. (“Jewelcor”), awarding judgment in favor of Jewelcor, and granting Jewelcor attorneys’ fees. The District Court had diversity jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and this court holds jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Appellants argue that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. John F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.