Legal Opinion

San Joaquin Ginning Co. v. McColgan

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1942No. L. A. 17846PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant, as Bank and Corporation Franchise Tax Commissioner, for a refund of a portion of the franchise taxes paid for the taxable year July 1, 1938, to June 30,1939, on the theory that on October 27, 1938, it had voluntarily wound up its affairs and been dissolved. It recovered judgment for the sum of $3,644.62, which represented the proportion of the first installment of the tax paid by it for the months of the taxable year following dissolution. The defendant prosecutes this appeal from the judgment on the ground that the plan and procedure adopted by the plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Groman v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Coastside County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. National Gypsum Co. v. Continental Brands Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  5. Koenig v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API