Legal Opinion

Dream Games of Arizona, Inc. v. PC ONSITE

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 2009No. 07-15847, 07-15919PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Dream Games of Arizona (“Dream Games”) prevailed in its lawsuit against PC Onsite for copyright infringement of “Fast Action Bingo,” an electronic video bingo game, and was awarded statutory damages. We must decide whether (1) the district court properly allowed the jury to see unprotectable elements of the game without identifying the protectable elements; (2) the jury should have been allowed to hear evidence that Fast Action Bingo was operated illegally in two states; (3) statutory damages were available to Dream Games despite the illegal operation; and (4) the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Earl v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. RR Street & Co. Inc. v. Transport Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Hunter v. County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. In Re Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Luchtel v. HagemannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API