Legal Opinion
State v. Hennings
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 26, 1970No. 516-41186-1PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, C. J.
By information, Floyd Hennings was charged with the crime of violating RCW 69.33.230, a section of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act. The specifics of the charge are that he “on or about the 4th day of June, 1968, willfully unlawfully and feloniously did have in his possession and did sell a certain narcotic drug, to-wit: Heroin.”
He was tried by jury and convicted. Hennings agrees that the evidence concerning his possession and sale of heroin to a police informer on June 4 was sufficient to sustain his conviction. His sole claim of error is that evi dence of a transaction on June 11, 1968, was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. BoggsWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Chicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- State v. ManriqueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CleppeWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Tarnef v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. HartzogCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.