Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Farley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1955No. Civ. 20704PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The sole question for decision is whether there is sufficient substantial proof to support the finding that the tortious act of a labor union’s agent was committed within the scope of his employment. Respondent sued appellant and its job steward Farley for damages on account of Farley’s striking respondent with a club on the head without justifiable cause. Judgment was entered on the court’s findings. The union appeals.

On May 14, 1952, one Eugene Farley was the steward of appellant, an unincorporated association. Respondent was, at the same time and place, a member of the plasterer’s union…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carr v. Wm. C. Crowell Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Fields v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Hiroshima v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Travis Glass Co. v. IbbetsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Williams v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Coats v. Construction & General Laborers Local No. 185California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Davis v. LOCAL UNION NO. 11, INTERNAT.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Daggitt v. United Food And Commercial Workers International Union, Local 304aCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API