Legal Opinion
Hauk v. Chater
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 27, 1995No. Civ. 94-2475-KHVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on Clarence B. Hauk’s motion seeking summary reversal or remand of the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. (Doc. # 9). The Commissioner requests an order affirming the denial of benefits. (Doc. # 11).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Claimant, Clarence B. Hauk, is a 46-year-old man with a high school education and one year of college. Hauk claims that because of various disabling conditions, he has been unable to work since July 22, 1990. His past…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Paul E. Dumas v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Rhonda Kay RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Coggon v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005