Blanchette v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
The plaintiffs’ contention that the pleas are bad in form need not be considered. The material facts were established by agreement and the Presiding Justice correctly understood the question intended to be raised. Treating the pleas, with the defendant’s acquiescence, as essentially motions to transfer the cases to the county in which the plaintiffs reside and holding as a matter of law that the actions should have been instituted there, he ordered the requisite change of venue. This procedure was entirely proper. P. L., c. 334, s. 8; Berry v. Osborn, 28 N. H. 279; Brooks v. Howard, 58 N. H.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boyer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1901
- Ryan v. Inyo Cerro Gordo Mining & Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Pue v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- Merchants National Bank of Manchester v. Town of ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- TIG Insurance v EIFlow InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015