Legal Opinion

Crider v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1972No. 971S269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This is an appeal by Lyle Crider, appellant (defendant below) from, a conviction for having an interest in a town contract pursuant to IC 1971, 18-1-2-4 (Ind. Ann. Stat. § 48-1247 [1963 Repl.]), which reads as follows:

“No member of the common council or board of trustees, nor any officer, clerk, or deputy of such officer, or other employee of any city or incorporated town of this state, shall, either directly or indirectly, be a party to, or in any manner interested in, any contract or agreement, either with such city or incorporated town, or with any officer, board, clerk, deputy or employee…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Logansport v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Knight & Jillson Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Dixon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Cheney v. UnroeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Herman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Crooke v. LugarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API