Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dodson v. DUBOSE STEEL, INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 2003No. COA02-543Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSteelman, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision affirming the portion of the Commission’s Opinion and Award concluding Dodson’s injury and death arose out of and in the course of his *10employment and awarding death benefits to plaintiff. Although I concur with the majority’s conclusion that Dubose’s argument under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-12(3) (2001) must fail, I do so on different grounds. The facts in this case are not in dispute; however, I recite additional facts to clarify and support my decision on this matter.

On 27 September 1999, John Dodson (“Dodson”) was transporting a load of steel…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Harless v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Hoyle v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API