Gaydosh v. Richmond Radiator Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Admittedly the claimant is entitled to occupational disease compensation, and the only question is which of three insurance carriers is liable for its payment. The referee and the board awarded compensation against the employer, Richmond Radiator Company, the Commonwealth, and the Travelers Insurance Company (hereafter called “Travelers”). Upon appeal the court below affirmed the board, and entered judgment. The case is here upon the appeal of the employer and Travelers in which the Commonwealth did not join. Appellees are Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Agostin v. Pittsburgh Steel Foundry Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Agostin v. Pittsburgh Steel Foundry Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Anderson v. Schroeder Monumental WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holahan v. Bergen Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Pekorofsky v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Ertz v. Glen Nan, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Karoly v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Lowe v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.