Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Shields

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1907No. 1,658PublishedCited by 26 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit upon a policy of accident insurance issued-by the New Amsterdam Casualty Company to Oliver H. Shields for the sum of $5,000, his wife, Julia M. Shields, being the beneficiary. The policy provided that in case of loss of life by accident the company would pay Julia M. Shields $5,000, and also for any surgical operation for appendicitis $100. While the policy was in force, on Thursday, September 7, 1905', Mr. Shields was driving in a buggy, when a front wheel ran off and he was thrown against *55the dashboard, striking his abdomen. That night he complained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  3. Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Continental Fire Insurance v. WhitakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Delaney v. Modern Accident ClubSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hoage v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  3. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Kerns v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. First Nat. Bank v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API