Legal Opinion

Pahlen v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1992No. CX-91-1345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellant Scott Pahlen’s driver’s license was revoked pursuant to the implied con sent law. He petitioned for judicial review, the trial court sustained the revocation, and appellant brought a new trial motion. The trial court denied the motion. Pahlen appeals from the order denying the new trial.

FACTS

In the early morning of February 28, 1991, appellant was arrested for DWI. After the officer read the implied consent advisory, appellant attempted to take a breath test. He did not provide an adequate sample.

Appellant’s driver’s license was revoked for refusing testing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Knutson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Welch v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Garcia v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API