Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1932No. 2213PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT

We will consider a number of the more material questions presented on the record. The weight of the evidence is challenged in the petition in error but it is not urged nor stressed in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error. This is proper acknowledgment of the fact that there was such conflict in the testimony as to permit of the verdict which the jury returned, if the indictment upon which plaintiff in error was required to go to trial charged an offense at law and plaintiff in error was accorded due process of law at his trial. We will say at the outset that, had we sat as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meek v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. State v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AveryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Abney v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API