Legal Opinion

Scott v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 14, 2006No. 2023051PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY G. ELDER, Judge.

Christopher Roosevelt Scott (appellant) appeals from his bench trial conviction for statutory burglary in violation of Code § 18.2-91. On appeal, he contends the trial court’s refusal to dismiss the indictment was reversible error because, while the indictment charged statutory burglary based on the allegation that he “feloniously did enter in the nighttime ... with intent to commit larceny,” it was undisputed that the entry actually occurred during daylight hours, and the indictment charged only an entering, rather than a breaking and entering as required to support a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  2. Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  3. United States v. Arthur FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. Mitchell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  5. Harrell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daniel Castendet-Lewis v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. Purvy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  3. Wright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. McKinneyNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2015
  5. Danielle Lee Polk v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API