Goldsmith v. Valentine
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Hearing on a petition for the writ of supersedeas to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
This is a petition [by Sarah C. Goldsmith and Loretta G. Bullock] for a writ of supersedeas to the supreme court of the District of Columbia. The material facts averred in the petition are as follows: On March 10th, 1910, one Charles M. Valentine filed a petition in said supreme court for a writ of habeas corpus, directed to Sarah C. Goldsmith and Loretta G. Bullock, requiring them to produce the body of the infant Bus-sell G. Valentine, son of said petitioner. Mrs. Goldsmith is 'the maternal grandmother of the child, the mother having died in February, 1910, when the child was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Draper v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States Ex Rel. Crawford v. AddisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wiggins v. BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Stebbins v. StebbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Potts v. CattertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Switzer v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1951
- Jaffe v. JaffeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.