Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 17, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Bond. J.). The facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Boyd, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court.

Tbis case was previously before us on an appeal taken by tbe receivers from an order sustaining tbe demurrer of Messrs. Hall and Spring to tbe bill of complaint. We affirmed tbe order, but remanded tbe cause so tbat tbe receivers could by proper amendment, if they saw fit, make tbe allegations held by us to be necessary. Tbe opinion then filed is reported in Hughes et al., Receivers, v. Hall et al., 117 Md. 547. An amended bill was filed by tbe receivers and to tbat these appellants filed a plea in which they averred, “Tbat said subscription…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  2. Pittsburg Steel Co. v. Baltimore Equitable SocietyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  3. Bettendorf Axle Co. v. FieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allender v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  2. Scheihing v. Baltimore & OHIO R. R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Hopper v. BrodieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  4. Butts v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Commissioners of Cambridge v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API