Legal Opinion

Lysholm v. Karlos

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1987No. CO-87-1172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Duane and Nancy Lysholm appeal from the denial of their motion to vacate a judgment against them following the dismissal of their case pursuant to Hennepin County's special rules. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In 1981, appellant Lysholm was involved in an auto accident with respondent Karlos. Lysholm was acting within the scope of his employment at Metro Salvage and Towing Co. (Metro). Metro’s workers’ compensation insurer, Aetna Life and Casualty Co. (Aetna), paid Lysholm substantial workers’ compensation benefits as a result of the injuries he sustained.

Lysholm began a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Howard v. FrondellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Sand v. School Service Employees Union, Local 284Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Lund v. Pan American MacHines SalesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of McCueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen WutzkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Cornell v. RipkaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. In Re the Estate of McCueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Shannon Fogarty v. Ciao BellaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API